Corgi and Basset Hound? I see a bit of German Shepherd in there, too. But those ears!
If you haven't yet read Part One and Two, you can find
them by scrolling down past this post or clicking on the title or date (April
30, May 1) in the left sidebar.
The Living Free Animal Sanctuary in Idyllwild,
California was founded in 1980 by Emily Jo Beard who "created a sanctuary
where animals would be safely housed without being caged." The mission of
the shelter is to "rescue, rehabilitate and find permanent homes for
healthy cats and dogs that were scheduled for shelter euthanasia." For my
Cali readers, if you haven't driven up to that beautiful mountain setting to
visit Living Free, I strongly recommend doing so—even if you're the sort of
sensitive person who becomes upset and/or saddened by visiting traditional animal
shelters. Trust me, you'll find nothing of the sort at Living Free, just happy
dogs in the kennels and happy cats in the cattery.
In my quest to find a companion who would fit well with
me, Thomas, Purrl and Sugar Plum (see previous post), I scrolled through the
profiles of the dogs currently available at Living Free and came upon the photo
above of "Impala." (I have my suspicions about the name choice; I'll
keep them to myself.) This is what his profile said:
Impala is a sweet, loving, happy dog that makes you feel good
just to look at him. His soft brown eyes sparkle with intelligence and humor
and he is always smiling. He loves people, wants to please and would be a
wonderful family dog. He is very agile and can jump up on a chair despite the
fact that his legs are very short.
Well, who doesn't want a dog who is "loving,
happy" and "is always smiling"? And on my part, ever since
little Harper (a Corgi/Sheltie mix) blessed my life (you will recognize her
name if you've read The Dogs Who Saved Me),
I've wondered if I might be blessed again with a Corgi mix. Add Basset Hound,
and that's double blessings. I shot off an email to Edgar, the kennel manager,
asking if Impala might still be available and received a response within a day confirming
that he was and inviting me to come up the mountain and meet him.
The sanctuary opens daily (except Wednesdays) at 11:00.
I was there the next day by 11:20—and by the time I signed in and got up to the
kennels, another family had already spent time with Impala. "But they haven't
filled out an application yet!" said the enthusiastic volunteer who
brought Impala out to meet me, explaining that it was already his second
introduction of the day. And did this dog match the description posted about
him online? Oh yes, and then some. He was a happy, tail-wagging bundle of dog
joy who loved being petted and meeting new people. "He's definitely a
favorite," the volunteer told me as he scratched behind the little dog's
ears and talked baby talk to him. I loved him at first sight. (The dog, not the
volunteer, though he was very nice as well.)
When I asked if I could take Impala for a short walk,
however, I was told that there was "some issue with his spine." The
volunteer went on to explain that Impala was a "return." He'd been
adopted previously at an adoption event, and though the family had kept him for
several months, they were now returning him—injured. They couldn't afford his
medical care, it seems. The online description of Impala was the one they'd
used prior to his first adoption; he could no longer jump up on a chair, and he
seemed to be in a considerable amount of pain.
"But the vet is coming on Wednesday and will give
him a thorough examination at that time," the volunteer said. "We're
giving him pain medication in the meantime, and it seems to be helping."
I decided not to bring Impala home, to wait and see what
the vet said. It's not that I was unwilling to take on a dog with medical
issues; I just didn't want to make an emotional decision ("But I love him!
So it will all be okay!") that wouldn't work with my pack and our
lifestyle. Any new dog would need to be able to walk with Thomas in the morning
and the evening. I needed confirmation from the vet that this would be possible
for this little dog who was short on legs and long on personality.
I did go home and immediately fill out and submit an
application online. Then I had to wait three long agonizing days until
Wednesday. I thought of him every day, looked at his picture, and hoped. On
Wednesday afternoon, I called the direct number they'd given me for the kennel—and
Edgar was busy. He returned my call a couple of hours later, but by then I was
out walking Thomas. We finally connected the next day, and after a long,
detailed conversation during which Edgar listened patiently to my concerns and
explained with absolute honesty all of Impala's limitations, I decided not to
adopt him. Edgar thanked me for weighing all the factors before making my
decision—then told me there was another family who'd just been waiting for me
to decline so that they could adopt him. Perfect.
And this is how dog adoption should go. In my mind, the
process should be one of matchmaking. The specific personality and behaviors—both
good and bad—of the dog should be matched carefully with the needs and
lifestyle of the adopter so that when a dog finally does get placed, that home
remains his or hers forever. Matching dogs to compatible humans can only be
done with patience, communication and understanding. This is how Sgt. Thomas
Tibbs came to bless my household, because of the terrific volunteers at Upland
Shelter, and I have to applaud Edgar and all the staff and volunteers at Living
Free for being equally dedicated to the well-being of each and every dog and
cat they rescue and place for adoption.
So: No short-legged Corgi/Hound for me. But hang on...
this story isn't over yet....